John Marron

417 S. 14th St.

Bradenton, FL 34207

St. Petersburg Times Letters to the Editor

P.O. Box 1211

St. Petersburg, FL 33731

Dear Editor,

I am writing this letter to voice my concern about the intrusion of the conservative groups who would use the state (or it seems any other means possible, including breaking the law) to impose their values on the personal, well reasoned, and court supported attempts to end the suffering of Theresa Schaivo as well as that of her husband.

My initial concern developed when I learned of several doctor evaluations that deemed Mrs. Schaivo to be in a completely irreversible vegetative state. In addition to this, her husband, Michael Schaivo, explained that it had been one of her wishes to not be kept alive in a vegetative state if she were ever to fall into such a state. It is my opinion and experiences that a spouse is far more likely to be in tune with the other's beliefs, values, and attitudes about life. Because Mrs. Schaivo never placed her feelings about these issues in writing, the word of Michael Schaivo would be the word I would trust. There has been no indication of malicious intent by Michael Schaivo and nothing at all was to be gained by the loss of his wife.

The actions of the previously mentioned conservative groups go against one of the highest held principles in our country: autonomy, i.e. the right to control the outcome of one's own life. The State has no place making decisions to control the life of one of its citizens, if that person has not done a criminal act, though in general these same conservatives support capital punishment. It is ironic that autonomy for business activity is a very high value in conservative circles but not autonomy for this most private decision. Another example of the hypocrisy of the conservative position regarding autonomy is that when it comes to making decisions concerning religious beliefs in this secular state, conservatives apparently feel it is most necessary for the government to become involved, therefore contradicting a separation of church and state.

It does not matter whether or not I believe Theresa Schaivo' s feeding tube should have been removed. What matters to me is that the control over the situation should have remained with her husband. Autonomy should continue to be upheld as the most important principle in our country.

 

Sincerely,

John Marron